Dino De Laurentiis Children, Project Zomboid Vaccine Mod, Animal Morph Generator, Articles C

2023 Cisco and/or its affiliates. For more information on the differences and an explanation of the packet exchange, refer toIKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. You cannot configure IKEv2 through the user interface. IOS XE routers must source IPSEC interfaces from the Service side VPN (not VPN0), but also, it is necessary to add a inbound IPv4 ACL to the Interface in VPN0 to permit UDP 500 (IPSEC) and if using NAT UDP 4500 as well.After the tunnel is established you can add a IPv4 static route on the Service side with a next hop of the Tunnel interface to route traffic via the tunnel. IKEv2-ERROR:Address type 1622425149 not supported My assumption is that although the IPSEC is created on the service side, by sourcing the tunnel from the interface with a public IP address in VPN0, the cEdge would VRF jump to VPN0. A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) implementation in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to prevent IKEv2 from establishing new security associations. I shared this with TAC too. Router 2 builds the response to IKE_AUTH packet that it received from Router 1. All rights reserved. The first CHILD_SA is created for the proxy_ID pair that matches the trigger packet. BR12-1X(config)# crypto ikev2 profile apple, BR12-1X(config-ikev2-profile)# config-exchange request, BR12-1X(config-ikev2-profile)# no config-exchange request. #address 10.0.0.2. The CLI based workaround for it (on cEdge). 189067: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:Config data recieved: 189068: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Config-type: Config-request, 189069: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:IKEv2 responder - unsupported attrib unknown in cfg-req, 189070: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:IKEv2 responder - unsupported attrib unknown in cfg-req, 189071: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:IKEv2 responder - unsupported attrib unknown in cfg-req, 189072: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Error in settig received config mode data, 189073: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Auth exchange failed, 189074: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):: Auth exchange failed, 189075: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Abort exchange, 189076: *Aug 8 14:01:22.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Deleting SA, 189077: *Aug 8 14:01:25.429 Chicago: IKEv2:Couldn't find matching SA: Detected an invalid IKE SPI, 189078: *Aug 8 14:01:25.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 2.2.2.2:4500/To 1.1.1.1:4500/VRF i0:f0], 189079: *Aug 8 14:01:25.429 Chicago: IKEv2:: A supplied parameter is incorrect, 189080: *Aug 8 14:01:28.429 Chicago: IKEv2:Couldn't find matching SA: Detected an invalid IKE SPI, 189081: *Aug 8 14:01:28.429 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 2.2.2.2:4500/To 1.1.1.1:4500/VRF i0:f0], 189082: *Aug 8 14:01:28.429 Chicago: IKEv2:: A supplied parameter is incorrect, 189083: *Aug 8 14:01:31.433 Chicago: IKEv2:Couldn't find matching SA: Detected an invalid IKE SPI, 189084: *Aug 8 14:01:31.433 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Received Packet [From 2.2.2.2:4500/To 1.1.1.1:4500/VRF i0:f0], 189085: *Aug 8 14:01:31.433 Chicago: IKEv2:: A supplied parameter is incorrect. Keyring: configure the key will be exchanged to establish phase1 and the type which is in our example (pre-shared) Example: #crypto ikev2 keyring cisco. Nonce Ni (optional): If the CHILD_SA is created as part of the initial exchange, a second KE payload and nonce must not be sent), KEi (Key-optional): The CREATE_CHILD_SA request might optionally contain a KE payload for an additional DH exchange to enable stronger guarantees of forward secrecy for the CHILD_SA. A Notify Payload may appear in a response message (usually specifying why a request was rejected), in an INFORMATIONAL Exchange (to report an error not in an IKE request), or in any other message to indicate sender capabilities or to modify the meaning of the request.If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is rekeying an existing SA other than the IKE_SA, the leading N payload of type REKEY_SA MUST identify the SA being rekeyed. Router 1 receives the IKE_SA_INIT response packet from Router 2. : crypto ikev2 profile default . I think i have the problem with the Source Interface (i receive"IKEv2-ERROR:Address type not supported" in log). The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of crafted IKEv2 SA-Init packets. Note: In this output, unlike in IKEv1, the PFS DH group value appears as "PFS (Y/N): N, DH group: none" during the first tunnel negotiation, but, after a rekey occurs, the right values appear. Help would really be appreciated. Router 1 initiates the CHILD_SA exchange. Thank You. New here? I'd like to configure a IPSEC tunnel to Zscaler, the interface should be sourced from VPN0 so that i can use the public IP address attached to my DIA circuit. The VPN is not connecting at all. Components Used The information in this document is based on these software and hardware versions: Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) tanyatamir53355. Use the VPN Interface IPsec feature template to configure IPsec tunnels on Cisco IOS XE service VPNs that are being used for Internet Key Exchange (IKE) sessions. I'd be interested to hear if you have the same issue? Do you had to apply some NAT config? Responder verifies and processes the IKE_INIT message: (1) Chooses crypto suite from those offered by the initiator, (2) computes its own DH secret key, and (3) it computes a skeyid value, from which all keys can be derived for this IKE_SA. Accepted Solutions. Learn more about how Cisco is using Inclusive Language. This packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), SAr1(cryptographic algorithm that IKE responder chooses), KEr(DH public Key value of the responder), and Responder Nonce. The connection uses a custom IPsec/IKE policy with the UsePolicyBasedTrafficSelectors option, as described in this article.. Which Interface did you use? The documentation set for this product strives to use bias-free language. *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:Adding ident handle 0x80000002 associated with SPI 0x9506D414 for session 8 *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK_RECD_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_START_ACCT *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Accounting not required *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHECK_DUPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:AUTH_DONEEvent: EV_CHK4_ROLE, *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:READYEvent: EV_CHK_IKE_ONLY *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: READY Event: EV_I_OK, *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:READYEvent: EV_R_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: READY Event: EV_NO_EVENT. You can only use PSK when the client is another FlexVPN hardware (router) client or Strongswan. You can use IKEv2 as a virtual private network (VPN) tunneling protocol that supports automatic VPN reconnection. These messages negotiate cryptographic algorithms, exchange nonces, and do a Diffie-Hellman exchange. I am trying to remote access to my Cisco 897VA Router using pre shared key only through Windows 10, Mac OS X and iPhone builtin IKEv2 VPN. Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. 0 Helpful Share Reply JW_UK Beginner In response to JW_UK Options 09-28-2019 03:19 AM The IKE_AUTH packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), IDi(initiator's identity), AUTH payload, SAi2(initiates the SA-similar to the phase 2 transform set exchange in IKEv1), and TSi and TSr (Initiator and Responder Traffic selectors): They contain the source and destination address of the initiator and responder respectively for forwarding/receiving encrypted traffic. Beginner. This exchange consists of a single request/response pair and was referred to as a phase 2 exchange in IKEv1. Note. The Notify Payload, is used to transmit informational data, such as error conditions and state transitions, to an IKE peer. Be aware the static route will only be withdrawn from the routing table if the Tunnel goes down. KEi (Key-optional): The CREATE_CHILD_SA request might optionally contain a KE payload for an additional DH exchange to enable stronger guarantees of forward secrecy for the CHILD_SA. IKEv2 Payload Types Transform Type Values IKEv2 Transform Attribute Types Transform Type 1 - Encryption Algorithm Transform IDs Transform Type 2 - Pseudorandom Function Transform IDs Transform Type 3 - Integrity Algorithm Transform IDs Transform Type 4 - Key Exchange Method Transform IDs Transform Type 5 - Extended Sequence Numbers Transform IDs All but the headers of all the messages that follow are encrypted and authenticated. Components Used The information in this document is based on these software and hardware versions: Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) Cisco IOS 15.1 (1)T or later Windows or MAC (native or AC) client can only use Certificates or EAP. 08-08-2018 Relevant Configuration:crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES256 protocol esp encryption aes-256 protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5, *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_RECV_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_NAT_T *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_PROC_ID *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Received valid parameteres in process id *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_IF_PEER_CERT_NEEDS_TO_BE_FETCHED_FOR_PROF_SEL *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_GET_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(1): Choosing IKE profile IKEV2-SETUP *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key by address 10.0.0.1 *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key by address 10.0.0.1 *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Adding Proposal default to toolkit policy *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Using IKEv2 profile 'IKEV2-SETUP' *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_SET_POLICY *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Setting configured policies *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_VERIFY_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_AUTH4EAP *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_POLREQEAP *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_AUTH_TYPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_GET_PRESHR_KEY *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_VERIFY_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_IC *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_REDIRECT *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Redirect check is not needed, skipping it *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_NOTIFY_AUTH_DONE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:AAA group authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:AAA user authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_SET_RECD_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Received config data from toolkit: *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_PROC_SA_TS *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_GET_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Error constructing config reply *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:No config data to send to toolkit: *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_MY_AUTH_METHOD *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_GET_PRESHR_KEY *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_GEN_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_SIGN *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_OK_AUTH_GEN *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_SEND_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Vendor Specific Payload: CISCO-GRANITE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Notify Payload: SET_WINDOW_SIZE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Notify Payload: ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Notify Payload: NON_FIRST_FRAGS, *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Next payload: ENCR, version: 2.0 Exchange type:IKE_AUTH, flags:RESPONDER MSG-RESPONSEMessage id: 1, length: 252 Payload contents: ENCR Next payload: VID, reserved: 0x0, length: 224 *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_PKI_SESH_CLOSE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Closing the PKI session *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_UPDATE_CAC_STATS *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event:EV_INSERT_IKE *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Store mib index ikev2 1, platform 60 *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_GEN_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Asynchronous request queued *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1): *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:AUTH_DONEEvent: EV_NO_EVENT, *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Got a packet from dispatcher *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Processing an item off the pak queue, *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK_RECD_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_START_ACCT *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHECK_DUPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHK4_ROLE, *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Next payload: ENCR, version: 2.0 Exchange type:IKE_AUTH, flags:RESPONDER MSG-RESPONSEMessage id: 1, length: 252 Payload contents: *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Vendor Specific Payload: (CUSTOM) VID Next payload: IDr, reserved: 0x0, length: 20 IDrNext payload: AUTH, reserved: 0x0, length: 12 Id type: IPv4 address, Reserved: 0x0 0x0 AUTHNext payload: SA, reserved: 0x0, length: 28 Auth method PSK, reserved: 0x0, reserved 0x0 SANext payload: TSi, reserved: 0x0, length: 40 last proposal: 0x0, reserved: 0x0, length: 36 Proposal: 1, Protocol id: ESP, SPI size: 4, #trans: 3 last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 1, reserved: 0x0, id: 3DES last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 3, reserved: 0x0, id: SHA96 last transform: 0x0, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 5, reserved: 0x0, id: Don't use ESN TSiNext payload: TSr, reserved: 0x0, length: 24 Num of TSs: 1, reserved 0x0, reserved 0x0 TS type: TS_IPV4_ADDR_RANGE, proto id: 0, length: 16 start port: 0, end port: 65535 start addr: 0.0.0.0, end addr: 255.255.255.255 TSr Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 24 Num of TSs: 1, reserved 0x0, reserved 0x0 TS type: TS_IPV4_ADDR_RANGE, proto id: 0, length: 16 start port: 0, end port: 65535 start addr: 0.0.0.0, end addr: 255.255.255.255 *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: SET_WINDOW_SIZE NOTIFY(SET_WINDOW_SIZE) Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 12 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: SET_WINDOW_SIZE *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT NOTIFY(ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT) Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 8 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: NON_FIRST_FRAGS NOTIFY(NON_FIRST_FRAGS) Next payload: NONE, reserved: 0x0, length: 8 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: NON_FIRST_FRAGS *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_WAIT_AUTH Event:EV_RECV_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_NOTIFY *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event:EV_PROC_MSG *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_IF_PEER_CERT_NEEDS_TO_BE_FETCHED_FOR_PROF_SEL *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_GET_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Adding Proposal PHASE1-prop to toolkit policy *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Using IKEv2 profile 'IKEV2-SETUP' *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_VERIFY_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_AUTH_TYPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_GET_PRESHR_KEY *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event:EV_VERIFY_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_EAP *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event:EV_NOTIFY_AUTH_DONE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:AAA group authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:AAA user authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_IC *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_IKE_ONLY *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_PROC_SA_TS *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_PKI_SESH_CLOSE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Closing the PKI session *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_UPDATE_CAC_STATS *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_INSERT_IKE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:Store mib index ikev2 1, platform 60 *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_GEN_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Asynchronous request queued *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1): *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_NO_EVENT *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:KMI message 8 consumed. This response packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), IDr(responder's identity), AUTH payload, SAr2(initiates the SA-similar to the phase 2 transform set exchange in IKEv1), and TSi and TSr(Initiator and Responder Traffic selectors). Palo Alto IP: 1.1.1.1 Cisco ASA IP: 2.2.2.2 Cisco ASA iKev2 and IPsec parameters: The DH Group configured under the crypto map would be used only during rekey. Client Related Configuration In my case even after adding the ACL entry there was another step which was needed to fix this tunnel. Local Address = 0.0.0.0. #proposal cisco. if my config was wrong then tunnel shouldn't come up when Cisco ASA sending traffic. Router 1 verifies and processes the authentication data in this packet. Refer toCisco Technical Tips Conventionsfor more information on document conventions. IKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging, Technical Support & Documentation - Cisco Systems, Router 1 receives a packet that matches the crypto acl for peer ASA 10.0.0.2. For a branch office VPN that uses IKEv1, the Phase 1 exchange can use Main Mode or Aggressive Mode. what i am missing here. IPSEC profile: this is phase2, we will create the transform set in here. Following is the output of above router debug crypto ikev2: 189014: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Received Packet [From 2.2.2.2:500/To 1.1.1.1:500/VRF i0:f0], Initiator SPI : 8A15E970577C6140 - Responder SPI : 0000000000000000 Message id: 0, SA KE N NOTIFY(REDIRECT_SUPPORTED) NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_SOURCE_IP) NOTIFY(NAT_DETECTION_DESTINATION_IP) NOTIFY(Unknown - 16430), 189015: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Verify SA init message, 189016: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Insert SA, 189017: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address 1.1.1.1, 189018: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Found Policy 'ikev2policy', 189019: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Processing IKE_SA_INIT message, 189020: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> PKI] Retrieve configured trustpoint(s), 189021: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[PKI -> IKEv2] Retrieved trustpoint(s): 'TP-self-signed-653483565', 189022: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> PKI] Get Public Key Hashes of trustpoints, 189023: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[PKI -> IKEv2] Getting of Public Key Hashes of trustpoints FAILED, 189024: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:Failed to retrieve Certificate Issuer list, 189025: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Computing DH public key, DH Group 14, 189026: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] DH key Computation PASSED, 189027: *Aug 8 14:01:22.145 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Request queued for computation of DH key, 189028: *Aug 8 14:01:22.149 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Computing DH secret key, DH Group 14, 189029: *Aug 8 14:01:22.149 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Request queued for computation of DH secret, 189030: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] DH key Computation PASSED, 189031: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[IKEv2 -> Crypto Engine] Calculate SKEYSEED and create rekeyed IKEv2 SA, 189032: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):[Crypto Engine -> IKEv2] SKEYSEED calculation and creation of rekeyed IKEv2 SA PASSED, 189033: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:IKEv2 responder - no config data to send in IKE_SA_INIT exch, 189034: *Aug 8 14:01:22.161 Chicago: IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 8673,SA ID = 1):Generating IKE_SA_INIT message. The mode determines the type and number of message exchanges that occur in this phase. The address range specifies that all traffic to and from that range are tunnelled. All of the devices used in this document started with a cleared (default) configuration. Router2 sends out the responder message to Router 1. Options. If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is rekeying an existing SA other than the IKE_SA, the leading N payload of type REKEY_SA must identify the SA being rekeyed. In the IKEv1 Phase 1 settings, you can select one of these modes: Main Mode. Thanks again for this article. New here? I have a working IPSEC project in GNS3 that uses csr1000 and 7200 routers, VTI interfaces, and IKEv1. The problem is that a 'VPN Interface IPSEC' is not available: https://www.zscaler.com/resources/solution-briefs/partner-viptela-cisco-sd-wan-deployment.pdf. Are you seeing encrypts and decrypts over your IPSEC tunnel? This is not a bug, even though the behavior is described in Cisco bug IDCSCug67056. 01:52 PM Related Community Discussions View Bug Details in Bug Search Tool Why Is Login Required? Same in every possible way. Initiator starts IKE_AUTH exchange and generates the authentication payload. For more information, refer toIKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. Has anyone been able to do this on a ISR4k? Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. Remote Type = 0. . With IKEv1, you see a different behavior, because Child SA creation happens during Quick Mode, and the CREATE_CHILD_SA message has a provision to carry the Key Exchange payload that specifies the DH parameters to derive a new shared secret. Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above.